Theorem: Let be a simple graph with , such that both and its complement are connected. Then (and its complement ) has an induced .
Proof: First of all note that since the complement of is still . Then has an induced if and only if has an induced . Similarly, has no induced if and only if has no induced .
Suppose for contradiction that the theorem statement is false. Suppose that there exists a simple graph on at least 2 vertices, such that (and ) has no induced . Let us find a minimal counter example, i.e., a graph with the minimum possible number of vertices, which is connected, its complement connected and has no induced .
There are no such graphs on 2 vertices, on 3 vertices and on 4 vertices.
Hence the minimal counterexample must have at least 5 vertices.
Let . Consider the subgraph . Since has no induced and is an induced subgraph of , then also has no induced . Since is a minimal counterexample, (which has less vertices than ) or its complement must be disconnected.
W.l.o.g. assume that is disconnected. Let be a component of . Since is connected, then is adjacent to at least one vertex of and one vertex of . Let us name these two vertices as and respectively. Moreover, since and are both connected, is not a dominating vertex. Hence there exists a vertex in or which is not adjacent to . W.l.o.g. let us assume that is in .
Consider the shortest path from to , where (any path from a vertex of to a vertex of must pass from ) and . Consider the induced subgraph . Since is a shortest path, we have , and . Thus is an induced . This gives a contradiction. Hence the result follows.